The report, authored by the White House Council of Economic Advisers, laid out a number of issues seen within the digital asset ecosystem.
The White House took aim at cryptocurrencies in a new report arguing that many aspects of the digital asset ecosystem are creating issues for consumers, the financial system and the environment.
The Economic Report of the President, published on Monday, is an annual publication by the Council of Economic Advisers aimed at explaining the President's economic priorities and policies. The March 2023 issue included an entire chapter on digital assets and "economic principles."
Monday's report comes amid growing industry concern that federal regulators are looking to de-bank crypto companies, though state and federal regulators have thus far denied these claims. Still, the tone of the report is unlikely to assuage these concerns.
Matthew Homer, a former deputy superintendent with the New York Department of Financial Services, told CoinDesk the report was a "damning indictment of the space that makes their policy position crystal clear."
"The amount of attention given to digital assets is substantial, especially when viewed in comparison to other areas of financial services that have arguably been far more detrimental over the past few weeks. The assessment is striking in its definitive tone and broad brush strokes," he said.
The report looked at a number of claims and stated goals from the crypto industry, ranging from cryptocurrencies' role as investment vehicles and payment tools to its potential use in payment infrastructure, saying that "many of them do not have a fundamental value" and noting other issues with the sector.
"It has been argued that crypto assets may provide other benefits, such as improving payment systems, increasing financial inclusion, and creating mechanisms for the distribution of intellectual property and financial value that bypass intermediaries that extract value from both the provider and recipient. Looking under the hood at these arguments, however, shows a more complicated picture. So far, crypto assets have brought none of these benefits," the report said.
Various disasters in the crypto sector, including last year's TerraUSD collapse, BitConnect and FTX, were cited as examples of how everyday Americans were harmed.
Other examples pointed to more subtle frauds, like Long Island Iced Tea changing its name to Long Blockchain to ride a stock price wave despite not having anything to do with blockchain at the time.
The report also took a minute to say a centralized internet is easier, citing Signal creator Moxie Marlinspike.
It also mentioned that forthcoming systems like the real-time payment FedNow network "could bring significant benefits to vulnerable segments of the populations."
"Some have suggested that near instant digital payment systems like FedNow may reduce the need for circulating digital money," the report said. "In this case, the benefits of circulating digital money after FedNow is launched may be minimal. In fact, Federal Reserve governor Michelle Bowman commented in August 2022 that 'my expectation is that FedNow addresses the issues that some have raised about the need for a CBDC.'"
Despite listing out these concerns, the report did not delve deeply into recommendations for future regulations or Congressional actions that could address the stated risks.
The section's conclusion acknowledged that the underlying distributed ledger technology "may still find productive uses in the future" for both government entities and private companies.
The report also acknowledged that "some crypto assets appear to be here to stay," though it went on to note that "they continue to cause risks for financial markets, investors and consumers."
"Much of the activity in the crypto asset space is covered by existing regulations and regulators are expanding their capabilities to bring a large number of new entities under compliance," the report said, pointing to the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Other parts of the crypto asset space require coordination by various agencies and deliberations about how to address the risks they pose."